BERLUSCONI LAWYERS DENY ‘BUNGA BUNGA’ PAYOFF

Category: News

Nicolo Ghedini
Nicolo Ghedini
By NICOLE WINFIELD
In this picture taken on Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2013, one of Silvio Berlusconi’s lawyers, Nicolo Ghedini, speaks at a press conference in Rome. An Italian court has accused ex-Premier Silvio Berlusconi and his lawyers of tampering with evidence by paying off witnesses in a trial related to his notorious “bunga bunga” parties. Citing testimony and telephone wiretaps, the Milan court said Berlusconi convened about a dozen young women to his Milan mansion on Jan. 15, 2011 to meet with his lawyers after the women’s homes were searched as part of the police investigation into the parties. From then on, the judges wrote, the women began receiving 2,500 euros each month from Berlusconi and subsequently they offered unusually identical testimony in court denying that the parties had sexual overtones. (AP Photo/Domenico Stinellis)
Italy Berlusconi

Silvio Berlusconi addresses supporters in Rome, Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013. The Italian Senate has expelled three-time ex-Premier Silvio Berlusconi from Parliament over his tax fraud conviction. The vote on Wednesday halts the 77-year-old Berlusconi’s legislative run for at least six years, but does not mark the end of his political career. Berlusconi maintained his defiance ahead of the vote, declaring Wednesday a “day of mourning for democracy” before thousands of cheering, flag-waving supporters outside his Roman palazzo. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
Prev 1 of 2 Next

ROME (AP) — An Italian court accused ex-Premier Silvio Berlusconi and his lawyers on Friday of tampering with evidence by paying off witnesses in a trial related to his notorious “bunga bunga” parties.

It sent its documentation to prosecutors to investigate the possible corruption of a judicial process. Berlusconi’s lawyers immediately rejected the accusation and said they expected prosecutors would drop the case.

If prosecutors go ahead, the accusation in the court’s ruling would lead to a new legal headache for Berlusconi, who this week was kicked out of Parliament for at least six years because of another, unrelated problem: a tax fraud conviction.

The court suggested that Berlusconi paid off the would-be show girls who attended his dinner parties to downplay the sexually charged nature of the evenings when they testified. He did so, the judges suggested, because he was facing related charges in another case involving accusations he paid for sex with an underage prostitute who was also a “bunga bunga” guest.

Citing testimony and telephone wiretaps, the Milan court said Berlusconi convened about a dozen of these young women to come to his Milan mansion on Jan. 15, 2011 to meet with his lawyers. They were summoned after the women’s homes were searched as part of the police investigation into the parties.

From then on, the judges wrote, the women began receiving 2,500 euros ($3,400) apiece each month from Berlusconi and subsequently they offered nearly identical testimony in court denying that the dinner parties had sexual overtones. The amount is about twice what an average worker in Italy earns a month.

The court made the accusation in explaining its July 19 decision to convict three of Berlusconi’s former associates of procuring girls to prostitute themselves at the parties.

Berlusconi wasn’t a defendant in the trial. He was convicted in a separate trial of paying for sex with 17-year-old Moroccan girl, Karima el-Mahroug, better known as Ruby, who attended the parties, and then trying to cover it up. Berlusconi’s lawyers have said they would appeal the verdict, seven-year prison term and a lifetime political ban.

Berlusconi has defended the payments to the girls, saying it is simply his nature to try to help people in need. Most of the women were aspiring show girls hoping to get a break on one of Berlusconi’s Mediaset television programs. Many lived in apartments owned by Berlusconi, wore jewelry that were gifts from him and some drove cars that he gave them for their birthdays.

In a statement Friday, Berlusconi attorneys Niccolo Ghedini and Piero Longo said there was “no connection whatsoever” between the January 2011 meeting and the payments the girls received, which the lawyers said only began in March of the following year.

The evidence tampering accusations, they said in a statement carried by the LaPresse news agency, “are completely disconnected from reality and factual substantiation.” They predicted that prosecutors, who had all this evidence in their possession earlier and didn’t press charges, would drop the case.

In its decision, the judges wrote that the girls gave “overlapping” testimony that contradicted testimony given by other participants in the parties who described sexually charged evenings where girls ended up in their underwear or dressed like nuns, dancing for Berlusconi and letting him touch them.

“All the people who received this amount of money gave declarations at trial that were perfectly overlapping, even in the use of language that was incongruent with their cultural background,” the judges wrote. “In particular, there was a repetition of names, terms and phrases that the witnesses, when asked, said they didn’t know the meaning of the word or phrase that they had used.”

“These were declarations that were directed in favor of Berlusconi,” the judges wrote.

The judges said it wasn’t merely an anomaly that Berlusconi was paying monthly stipends to witnesses testifying in a trial in which he was indirectly implicated. “It’s an illegal act: Tampering with evidence.”

In saying they had forwarded all the trial documentation to prosecutors, the judges accused Berlusconi of making the payments, and two of his lawyers of participating in the Jan. 15, 2011 meeting. The judges accused the women of giving false testimony.

___

Related Articles