In this Wednesday, July 24, 2013 photo, Mamnoon Hussain, a candidate from ruling party Pakistan Muslim League-N arrives to submit his nomination papers for upcoming presidential election in Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistani lawmakers are set to elect the country’s next president in a vote that has been marred by controversy despite widespread agreement that the ruling party’s candidate will likely emerge as the winner. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistani lawmakers are set to elect the country’s next president in a vote that has been marred by controversy despite widespread agreement that the ruling party’s candidate will likely emerge as the winner.
The expected victor in Tuesday’s election is Mamnoon Hussain, a textile businessman who has been a longtime member of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-N party and briefly served as the governor of southern Sindh province in 1999.
Pakistan’s largely ceremonial president is not elected by popular vote, but by lawmakers in the Senate, National Assembly and the assemblies of the four provinces. The PML-N has a very strong position because it won majorities in the National Assembly and the assembly of Pakistan’s most populous province, Punjab, in June, all but assuring that Hussain will win the vote.
“The election is more or less a settled issue,” said Pakistani political analyst Hasan Askari Rizvi. “There is no excitement in it because it has become a one-sided affair, and the powers of the president are very limited and nominal.”
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif will remain the most powerful figure in the civilian government in Pakistan, a key ally for the United States in battling Islamic militants and negotiating an end to the war in neighboring Afghanistan.
Controversy broke out last week when the Supreme Court agreed to a request by the PML-N to move forward the election — originally scheduled for August 6 — because some lawmakers wanted to travel to Saudi Arabia for pilgrimage during the end of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.
The country’s former ruling party, the Pakistan People’s Party, which has the second highest number of seats in the National Assembly, announced that it would boycott the presidential election in response to the court’s ruling. The PPP complained that the judges ruled without hearing from the opposition, and the new election date didn’t give the party enough time to campaign.
The party’s decision could affect the perceived legitimacy of the election, although Hussain was still expected to win even if the PPP fielded a candidate. The only other person running in the election is Wajihuddin Ahmed, a retired Sindh High Court judge nominated by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, led by former cricket star Imran Khan.
Hussain was born to an Urdu-speaking industrialist family in 1940 in the Indian city of Agra. His family settled in Karachi, the capital of Sindh province, after Pakistan was carved out of British India in 1947, and set up a textile business there. He earned a Masters in Business Administration from the Institute of Business Administration in Karachi in 1965 and joined the family business before graduation.
Hussain served as governor of Sindh for about four months in 1999, but otherwise has not been a prominent figure in national politics.
“Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif likes to bring in political nonentities so he is the center of power and in the limelight,” said Rizvi, the analysts. “So I don’t think this new president will be attracting much attention or creating much excitement.”
If elected, Hussain will replace the current president, Asif Ali Zardari, whose five-year term ends on Sept. 8. Zardari rose to power after his wife, former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, was killed in a gun and bomb attack in Dec. 2007. He was elected president in 2008 after the PPP swept to victory in elections, riding a wave of sympathy after Bhutto’s assassination.
Zardari has been a contentious figure as president and has often battled with both the powerful army and the Supreme Court.
His biggest accomplishment is widely seen as helping the first civilian government finish its full five-year term and transfer power in democratic elections in a country plagued by military coups. He did this by building and maintaining the coalitions needed to keep power. He also agreed to a constitutional amendment that transferred many of the president’s powers to the prime minister, leaving his position as largely ceremonial.
But Zardari’s government did little to address the major problems facing the country, especially the pervasive electricity shortages that crippled Pakistan’s economy and left some people without power for up to 20 hours per day. The army launched major operations against the Pakistani Taliban during Zardari’s tenure, but the group has proven resilient and continues to stage frequent attacks against security personnel and civilians.
“Zardari’s government had absolutely poor performance as far as governance was concerned, and there was a serious reputation problem because of corruption allegations,” said Rizvi. “Zardari will be remembered as a quite a controversial president, but a major survivor.”
Associated Press writer Zarar Khan contributed to this report.